Is Evolution a theory in crisis? Is Darwinism a plot and conspiracy? On the contrary, evolutionary theory is robust with applications to most areas of our lives. Watch Sloan Wilson explain how this theory has amazing explanatory power and is now finally moving into the social sciences and even to the study of religion.
Evolution for Everyone
(YouTube: 56 min.)
How sure are you of your conclusions about life and its events? We are only as good as our sources of information. Go ahead, take the quiz (Christian Science Monitor).
Are you smarter than a Fox News viewer? How about a CNN viewer?
Nazi references in the media: Fox News and rebuttal to Fox claims.
Fox News caught in deceptive broadcast
Another deceptive broadcast: Palm trees in Wisconsin?
Also: "Should anyone be wondering, a lot of those "professional" signs are being created by MATC's graphic design instructors. As a recent graduate of the program, I'm still in touch with a lot of them. It has nothing to do with union organization, just angry teachers who happen to have suitable skills for this sort of thing."
Glenn Beck and Nazi References
But, what if you are a creationist?
(The real problem?)
While we may be offering the best scientific answer to explain the diversity of our world, we are not simultaneously offering to replace what they risk losing. Some people will courageously take the leap into a more scientific worldview, but we are probably safe in assuming that those folks are the exception, not the rule."
Full short article here --- Link I'll Trade You An Evolutionay Theory For Your Creationism, by Josh Witten. Jan. 12, 2011
A Tale of Three Creationists, Part 1
"Evolution is not a theory in crisis. It is not teetering on the verge of collapse. It has not failed as a scientific explanation. There is evidence for evolution, gobs and gobs of it. It is not just speculation or a faith choice or an assumption or a religion. It is a productive framework for lots of biological research, and it has amazing explanatory power. There is no conspiracy to hide the truth about the failure of evolution. There has really been no failure of evolution as a scientific theory. It works, and it works well. (Emphasis in the original)"
"Creationist students, listen to me very carefully: There is evidence for evolution, and evolution is an extremely successful scientific theory. That doesn't make it ultimately true, and it doesn't mean that there could not possibly be viable alternatives. It is my own faith choice to reject evolution, because I believe the Bible reveals true information about the history of the earth that is fundamentally incompatible with evolution. I am motivated to understand God's creation from what I believe to be a biblical, creationist perspective. Evolution itself is not flawed or without evidence. Please don't be duped into thinking that somehow evolution itself is a failure. Please don't idolize your own ability to reason. Faith is enough. If God said it, that should settle it. Maybe that's not enough for your scoffing professor or your non-Christian friends, but it should be enough for you. (Emphasis in the original)"
"A very popular argument is that similarity does not necessarily indicate common ancestry but could also imply common design … While this is true, the mere fact of similarity is only a small part of the evolutionary argument. Far more important than the mere occurrence of similarity is the kind of similarity observed. Similarity is not random. Rather, it forms a detectable pattern with some groups of species more similar than others. As an example consider a 200,000 nucleotide region from human chromosome 1. When compared to the chimpanzee, the two species differ by as little as 1-2%, but when compared to the mouse, the differences are much greater. Comparison to chicken reveals even greater differences. This is exactly the expected pattern of similarity that would result if humans and chimpanzees shared a recent common ancestor and mice and chickens were more distantly related. The question is not how similarity arose but why this particular pattern of similarity arose. To say that God could have created the pattern is merely ad hoc"
Evolutionary theist Dennis Venema quoting young earth creationist and biologist Todd Wood. Full Biologos article, Jan. 7, 2010 Link
Feelings. Red pill - Blue pill
~~~
Terms
Vestigial Structures
Atavisms
DNA Evidence - Insertions
1. ERVs 2. Transposons
Human Chrom. 2 Fusion
Pseudogenes
Human Lice & Evolution
Old Testament
Job
Old Testament Narratives
Biblical Genocide
Noahian Flood
"Firmament" - Flat Earth
Document Changes
Scriptural Contradictions
Who Wrote The Bible?
Misc. Areas of Interest
Reviews (Books)
Reviews (Movies)
Abortion
Josephus & Christianity
Christians Need Evolution
Why did Jesus not return?
Why evidence is not effective
Other Topics
The New 3 "Rs"
Thanksgiving - Origin
Christmas - Origin
Truth, Integrity & Ethics
Science and Religion
Famous American Quotes
Homosexuality
Science & Religion links
Science-Religion Conflicts
~~~
Human Migration
Adam & Eve - Genomics
The Church & Evolution
Intelligent Design
Young Earth Creationism
Theistic Evolution
Christianity & Evolution
Macroevolution is true
Human evolution is true
Scriptures are not inspired
Theism not believable
It's not about the evidence
World Views In Collision
~~~
Why Care?
You are viewing the text version of this site.
To view the full version please install the Adobe Flash Player and ensure your web browser has JavaScript enabled.
Need help? check the requirements page.